lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <>
Subject Re: Branding Solr+Lucene
Date Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:15:43 GMT
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Yonik Seeley <> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Ryan McKinley <> wrote:
> > I'm confused... what is the need for a new name?  The only place where
> > there is a conflict is in the top level svn tree...
> Agree, no need to re-brand.

I don't see any need to rebrand.  The artifacts will still be called Lucene
and Solr, regardless.  In SVN, the natural thing to do is go with the
momentum that puts solr under lucene.  Insofar as the TLP, I would think
that it would still be Lucene with two delivered artifacts.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message