lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yonik Seeley <yo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)
Date Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:29:19 GMT
Thanks everyone, this vote has passed.
A bit more contentious of a PMC vote than usual, but the committer
vote was clear.

-Yonik


On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Yonik Seeley <yseeley@gmail.com> wrote:
> Apoligies in advance for calling yet another vote, but I just wanted
> to make sure this was official.
> Mike's second VOTE thread could probably technically stand on it's own
> (since it included PMC votes), but given that I said in my previous
> VOTE thread that I was just polling Lucene/Solr committers and would
> call a second PMC vote, that may have acted to suppress PMC votes on
> Mike's thread also.
>
> Please vote for the proposal quoted below to merge lucene/solr development.
> Here's my +1
>
> -Yonik
>
> Mike's call for a VOTE (amongst lucene/solr committers +11 to -1):
> http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a400ffe62ae21aca/vote_merge_the_development_of_solr_lucene_take_2#22d7cd086d9c5cf0
>> Subject: Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2)
>> A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only
>> that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't):
>>
>>  * Merging the dev lists into a single list.
>>
>>  * Merging committers.
>>
>>  * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or
>>    to Lucene), all tests must pass.
>>
>>  * Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may
>>    release without Solr.
>>
>>  * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break
>>    out query parser, move all core queries & analyzers under their
>>    contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers,
>>    queries).
>>
>> These things would not change:
>>
>>  * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored
>>    into separate dirs/modules the way it is now.
>>
>>  * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX
>>    issues).
>>
>>  * User's lists remain separate.
>>
>>  * Web sites remain separate.
>>
>>  * Release artifacts/jars remain separate.
>

Mime
View raw message