lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yonik Seeley <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development
Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:00:12 GMT
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Michael Busch <> wrote:
> On 3/3/10 4:41 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> Agreed - a better description of what we are voting on should have been
>> included.
>> I'm only for the merge with aligned releases - its the only way Solr can
>> really stay on Lucene trunk happily. Aligned releases are also my biggest
>> worry (and part of why I initially leaned against such a merge), but without
>> it, there goes all of the larger reasons I'm into the merge now - Solr can
>> be on trunk and we can have better sharing / less duplication between the
>> projects - which I personally think requires Solr being on Lucene trunk - or
>> it won't really work at all. And Solr being on trunk really needs aligned
>> releases
> So if it seems like that most people are concerned about releases (even
> those you are generally in favor of this proposal), then maybe we should
> discuss exactly this point. We haven't really discussed alternatives about
> the release alignment. This vote feels rushed.

It's been discussed for a week, and I'm with Mark - I'm only for a
real merge of development, and that includes release schedules.


View raw message