lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)
Date Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:17:12 GMT
Hey Patrick,

> Actually Mark the problem with Spatial is that there hasn't been enough
> folks involved in it as a project. I am a single point of failure for it. So
> I have gone about solving that, by getting assistance from several experts
> in this field to help put this proposal together
> <>And we should
> be committing very soon

We're happy to be working with you, and I think you've got that "expert"
title in this area well pinned down.


> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Mark Miller <> wrote:
>> On 03/13/2010 10:36 PM, patrick o'leary wrote:
>>> As for this vote, I will allow our proximity to St. Patricks day to tone
>>> down my description of it, by describing it as shenanigans !
>> As long as we are talking about what committers should be working on, I
>> wish you'd support the spatial contrib you dumped in. I've explained the
>> issues with it in the past, and while you agreed about them, where is the
>> help!
>> Field Collapsing is a biggie (I think Shalin was working at it a bit, along
>> with others at different times), and not an easy one to make time for, or
>> take responsibility for the commit - especially with so many having concerns
>> with its scalability - but if you help at all with spatial, I promise to
>> push on Field Collapsing. Its why you were made a contrib committer. I'm not
>> sure why you accepted if someone else could have just committed the code
>> load.

Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA

View raw message