lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development
Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:14:51 GMT
Hey Doug,

Doesn't this move towards having a shared code base, and more so the criteria for that of
a TLP? Thoughts?


On 3/4/10 3:08 PM, "Doug Cutting" <> wrote:

Uwe Schindler wrote:
> One idea: If we really make solr depend on the new lucene lib, solr
> should not have lucene jars in its lib folder, but instead the
> nightly build should fetch the jars from the lucene hudson build.

If Solr trunk is meant to always be based on Lucene trunk, then
shouldn't they both be under a single trunk?  A Solr release would then
not include an independent version of Lucene, but would rather be an
alternate avenue for releasing the Lucene code.  One could tag, branch
and release them separately or together.  If separately, then a Solr
release tag might include a version of Lucene that's never released


Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message