lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2)
Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:11:38 GMT
Hi All,

-1 for the same reasons I mentioned previously. Again, I'm wearing my I'm-interested-in-this-discussion-but-not-a-Lucene/Solr-committer


On 3/4/10 1:33 PM, "Michael McCandless" <> wrote:

A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only
that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't):

 * Merging the dev lists into a single list.

 * Merging committers.

 * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or
   to Lucene), all tests must pass.

 * Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may
   release without Solr.

 * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break
   out query parser, move all core queries & analyzers under their
   contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers,

These things would not change:

 * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored
   into separate dirs/modules the way it is now.

 * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX

 * User's lists remain separate.

 * Web sites remain separate.

 * Release artifacts/jars remain separate.


Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message