lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2)
Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:34:38 GMT
I forgot my vote: +1

Mike

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Michael McCandless
<lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only
> that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't):
>
>  * Merging the dev lists into a single list.
>
>  * Merging committers.
>
>  * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or
>   to Lucene), all tests must pass.
>
>  * Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may
>   release without Solr.
>
>  * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break
>   out query parser, move all core queries & analyzers under their
>   contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers,
>   queries).
>
> These things would not change:
>
>  * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored
>   into separate dirs/modules the way it is now.
>
>  * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX
>   issues).
>
>  * User's lists remain separate.
>
>  * Web sites remain separate.
>
>  * Release artifacts/jars remain separate.
>
> Mike
>

Mime
View raw message