lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2)
Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:42:41 GMT
+1

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Andi Vajda <vajda@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Andi..
>
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only
>> that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't):
>>
>> * Merging the dev lists into a single list.
>>
>> * Merging committers.
>>
>> * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or
>>  to Lucene), all tests must pass.
>>
>> * Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may
>>  release without Solr.
>>
>> * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break
>>  out query parser, move all core queries & analyzers under their
>>  contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers,
>>  queries).
>>
>> These things would not change:
>>
>> * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored
>>  into separate dirs/modules the way it is now.
>>
>> * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX
>>  issues).
>>
>> * User's lists remain separate.
>>
>> * Web sites remain separate.
>>
>> * Release artifacts/jars remain separate.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>



-- 
Robert Muir
rcmuir@gmail.com

Mime
View raw message