lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
Subject Less drastic ways
Date Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:28:46 GMT
Hi,

Consider this just an email to clarify things for Otis (and maybe a few other people).

Are the following the main goals of the recent merge voting thread(s)?
* Make it easier for Solr to ride the Lucene trunk
* Make it easier for people to avoid committing new features to Solr when they really belong
to some lower level code - either Lucene core or some Lucene module

Is the only or main change being proposed that lucene-dev and solr-dev mode to some common-dev
(or lucene-dev)?

If the above is correct, here is what I don't understand:
* Why can't Solr riding on Lucene trunk be achieved by getting Lucene trunk build into Solr
lib in svn on a daily/hourly basis?
* Why can't existing Solr functionality that has been identified as "should really have been
committed to Lucene instead of Solr" be moved to Lucene over the coming months?
* Why can't Solr developers be required to be subscribed to lucene-dev?
* Why can't Solr developers be required/urged to commit any new functionality to Lucene if
solr-dev and lucene-dev people think that's where it belongs? i.e. communicate before committing
- the same as "measure twice, cut once".

Thanks,
Otis


Mime
View raw message