lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Busch <busch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2)
Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:13:27 GMT
+1. This compromise is what I was hoping for.

  Michael

On 3/4/10 1:33 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only
> that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't):
>
>   * Merging the dev lists into a single list.
>
>   * Merging committers.
>
>   * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or
>     to Lucene), all tests must pass.
>
>   * Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may
>     release without Solr.
>
>   * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break
>     out query parser, move all core queries&  analyzers under their
>     contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers,
>     queries).
>
> These things would not change:
>
>   * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored
>     into separate dirs/modules the way it is now.
>
>   * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX
>     issues).
>
>   * User's lists remain separate.
>
>   * Web sites remain separate.
>
>   * Release artifacts/jars remain separate.
>
> Mike
>
>    


Mime
View raw message