lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2)
Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:35:27 GMT
+1

On 03/04/2010 04:34 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> I forgot my vote: +1
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Michael McCandless
> <lucene@mikemccandless.com>  wrote:
>    
>> A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only
>> that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't):
>>
>>   * Merging the dev lists into a single list.
>>
>>   * Merging committers.
>>
>>   * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or
>>    to Lucene), all tests must pass.
>>
>>   * Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may
>>    release without Solr.
>>
>>   * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break
>>    out query parser, move all core queries&  analyzers under their
>>    contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers,
>>    queries).
>>
>> These things would not change:
>>
>>   * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored
>>    into separate dirs/modules the way it is now.
>>
>>   * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX
>>    issues).
>>
>>   * User's lists remain separate.
>>
>>   * Web sites remain separate.
>>
>>   * Release artifacts/jars remain separate.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>      


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




Mime
View raw message