lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development
Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:22:01 GMT
On 03/04/2010 01:16 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : In particular, how would the above baby step address the code
> : duplication (my goal in the original opening) -- eg the 3 places where
> : concrete analyzers/queries are today.  How would it lead to making
> : facets work with pure Lucene?  To developing spatial in one place?
>
> Having a shared dev list and a unified committer base should (in theory)
> help improve the situation of duplicated functionality and promote
> refactoring (ie: all commiters are on the same page, and can add/move
> classes/tests arround)
>
> If those changes don't have that effect, then i really don't see how
> integrating the build processes or releases cycles will ever improve the
> situation.
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>    
If Solr is not on Lucene trunk, that's not going to happen.

Solr on Lucene trunk is key. Release cycles is key to that.

Build process is key to getting devs that stick in one world to branch 
into the other just a bit.

-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




Mime
View raw message