lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrzej Bialecki ...@getopt.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development
Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:31:12 GMT
On 2010-03-03 23:42, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Many Lucene/Solr committers think that merging development would be a
> benefit to both projects.
> Separate downloads would remain (among other things), so end users
> would not be impacted (except for higher quality products over time).
> Since this is a change to Lucene/Solr project development, I'd like to
> get a format vote from the committers of both projects.
> If there are 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s, we can pass this to the
> Lucene PMC to ratify.
>
> -Yonik
>
> Discussion thread:
> http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/c7817932400808ad/factor_out_a_standalone_shared_analysis_package_for_nutch_solr_lucene
>
>

Tentative +1, if the consensus from the discussion is written down 
somewhere as "bylaws" that we can refer to when solving unexpected 
complications resulting from this merge (project mgmt, committer access, 
test reqs, rolling out releases etc...)


-- 
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki     <><
  ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com


Mime
View raw message