lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Busch <busch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development
Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:40 GMT
I also feel like this vote is too broad. E.g. I'm ok with merging 
dev-lists and committers, but unhappy about aligning releases. What 
points exactly are we voting here on?

  Michael

On 3/3/10 3:54 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> See the linked to discussion. (I know its pretty long)
>
> I think Mike covered the broad strokes here: 
> http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/477615025eaa0e9d/factor_out_a_standalone_shared_analysis_package_for_nutch_solr_lucene

>
>
> Though I'm sure its open to tuning. I think the discussion gives the 
> gist of what the pro mergers want though (though many responders 
> appeared to be confused as to what most of us think the merge means, 
> so who knows)
>
> - Mark
>
> On 03/03/2010 06:48 PM, Bill Au wrote:
>> What does merging development mean?  I think we probably should be more
>> specific since that can mean different things to different folks.  We 
>> should
>> be all voting on the same thing.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Yonik Seeley<yonik@apache.org>  wrote:
>>
>>> Many Lucene/Solr committers think that merging development would be a
>>> benefit to both projects.
>>> Separate downloads would remain (among other things), so end users
>>> would not be impacted (except for higher quality products over time).
>>> Since this is a change to Lucene/Solr project development, I'd like to
>>> get a format vote from the committers of both projects.
>>> If there are 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s, we can pass this to the
>>> Lucene PMC to ratify.
>>>
>>> -Yonik
>>>
>>> Discussion thread:
>>>
>>> http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/c7817932400808ad/factor_out_a_standalone_shared_analysis_package_for_nutch_solr_lucene

>>>
>>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message