lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Miller <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development
Date Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:54:33 GMT
See the linked to discussion. (I know its pretty long)

I think Mike covered the broad strokes here:

Though I'm sure its open to tuning. I think the discussion gives the 
gist of what the pro mergers want though (though many responders 
appeared to be confused as to what most of us think the merge means, so 
who knows)

- Mark

On 03/03/2010 06:48 PM, Bill Au wrote:
> What does merging development mean?  I think we probably should be more
> specific since that can mean different things to different folks.  We should
> be all voting on the same thing.
> Bill
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Yonik Seeley<>  wrote:
>> Many Lucene/Solr committers think that merging development would be a
>> benefit to both projects.
>> Separate downloads would remain (among other things), so end users
>> would not be impacted (except for higher quality products over time).
>> Since this is a change to Lucene/Solr project development, I'd like to
>> get a format vote from the committers of both projects.
>> If there are 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s, we can pass this to the
>> Lucene PMC to ratify.
>> -Yonik
>> Discussion thread:

- Mark

View raw message