lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Miller <>
Subject Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene?
Date Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:39:03 GMT
On 02/28/2010 12:52 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
> ... I think it's a good
> idea for SOLR to ride on Lucene's trunk again...
> However, I'm -1 for these points:
>  * When a change it committed to Lucene, it must pass all Solr tests.
>  * Release both at once.

These are huge reasons why we *don't* want SOLR to ride on Lucene's 
trunk anymore.

bq. but we have to ask why they weren't added to Lucene in the first place.

Because the two communities are fairly separate in a lot of ways. This 
is one of the things a potential merge would solve. We can say that the 
projects should communicate more all we look - the history of saying 
such things implies there will be no changes though.

I'm still +0 here, but I'm starting to lean towards merge just sitting 
here disagreeing with everyone arguing against :)

Solr is actually part of the project "Lucene" along with Lucene-Java. 
The divide now is actually almost unnatural considering how things
are organized.

To those arguing that this would make Solr a first class citizen of 
Lucene over other search solutions that use Lucene, that actually 
already is the case, and the way things are setup, it should be. Solr is 
part of the Lucene project. Other Lucene search engines are not. That 
doesn't mean we shouldn't consider Lucene changes in the context of all 
the projects that may use it, but Solr already is a first class citizen. 
Its not just some project using Lucene - its *the* Lucene project's 
Search Server. Lucene devs *should* consider Solr when developing on 
Lucene Java - they are the same project - Lucene.

- Mark

View raw message