lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "patrick o'leary" <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)
Date Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:02:01 GMT
Actually Mark the problem with Spatial is that there hasn't been enough
folks involved in it as a project. I am a single point of failure for it. So
I have gone about solving that, by getting assistance from several experts
in this field to help put this proposal together

<>And we should
be committing very soon

On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Mark Miller <> wrote:

> On 03/13/2010 10:36 PM, patrick o'leary wrote:
>> As for this vote, I will allow our proximity to St. Patricks day to tone
>> down my description of it, by describing it as shenanigans !
> As long as we are talking about what committers should be working on, I
> wish you'd support the spatial contrib you dumped in. I've explained the
> issues with it in the past, and while you agreed about them, where is the
> help!
> Field Collapsing is a biggie (I think Shalin was working at it a bit, along
> with others at different times), and not an easy one to make time for, or
> take responsibility for the commit - especially with so many having concerns
> with its scalability - but if you help at all with spatial, I promise to
> push on Field Collapsing. Its why you were made a contrib committer. I'm not
> sure why you accepted if someone else could have just committed the code
> load.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message