lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "patrick o'leary" <pj...@pjaol.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)
Date Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:07:00 GMT
Sigh...
http://www.surveymonkey.com/

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > * I think Grant may be right.  We don't need this discussion.  Because
> the Solr/Lucene developer overlap is excellent, why not just start moving
> selected Solr code to new Lucene modules, just like Mike proposed we move
> Analysis from Lucene core to a new Lucene module?
>
> Note, if you read what I said again you will realize I wasn't actually
> proposing this.  I was saying actually, that I think it would not be
> something that people really wanted, even though it is perfectly "legal",
> just like poaching is perfectly "legal", but isn't, in my mind a good
> solution.  Sigh.  The problem with email, I guess, especially on long
> threads.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message