lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)
Date Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:04:28 GMT
Would it be correct to say that in order to have a voting be perfectly clear, the VOTE thread
should have just the votes and no comments/discussion?

Otis


----- Original Message ----
> From: Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, March 12, 2010 11:02:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3)
> 
> 
On Mar 12, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:

> Hi 
> Simon,
> 
> On 3/12/10 4:30 AM, "Simon Willnauer" <
> ymailto="mailto:simon.willnauer@googlemail.com" 
> href="mailto:simon.willnauer@googlemail.com">simon.willnauer@googlemail.com>
> 
> wrote:
> 
>> I don't think that is the case. A large amount of 
> different concerns
>> are out there. Simply based on the amount of 
> "huge" comments this
>> seems to be not a clearly passed 
> vote.
>> 
>> simon
> 
> Agreed. 
> 
> 


Comments are not votes.  Tally up the +1, 0, and -1's.  
> There is your vote.  If people don't understand that the thing you are 
> voting on is the first email in the [VOTE] thread, then I don't know how else to 
> explain it.  This thread very clearly has something to vote on it in the 
> first thread.


-Grant 


Mime
View raw message