lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2)
Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:45:50 GMT
I am fine with that. +1

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:lucene@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 10:33 PM
> To: general@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2)
> 
> A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only
> that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't):
> 
>  * Merging the dev lists into a single list.
> 
>  * Merging committers.
> 
>  * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or
>    to Lucene), all tests must pass.
> 
>  * Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may
>    release without Solr.
> 
>  * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break
>    out query parser, move all core queries & analyzers under their
>    contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers,
>    queries).
> 
> These things would not change:
> 
>  * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored
>    into separate dirs/modules the way it is now.
> 
>  * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX
>    issues).
> 
>  * User's lists remain separate.
> 
>  * Web sites remain separate.
> 
>  * Release artifacts/jars remain separate.
> 
> Mike


Mime
View raw message