Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
From: "Uwe Schindler" <uwe@thetaphi.de>
To: <java-dev@lucene.apache.org>,
	<general@lucene.apache.org>
References: <001601caadcf$d2b80030$78280090$@de>
In-Reply-To: <001601caadcf$d2b80030$78280090$@de>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Lucene Java 2.9.2 and 3.0.1 release artifacts
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:30:08 +0100
Message-ID: <000901caafbc$2decda50$89c68ef0$@de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-index: Acqtz9IN/Tk/vM7kTUy5DGAzmWtDPwB4DStg
Content-Language: de

Hi all,

I tested the lucene-core-3.0.1.jar in production since Sunday afternoon, =
no problems. I also replaced by the 2.9.2 file in my dev environment =
(without recompilations, because the locally added generics would break =
only the compilation but not the JVM of my projects) and tested: works.

I also downloaded the artifacts to a computer without my own trustdb, =
imported KEYS and verified the signatures - no problems (only the GPG =
warning about the fact that the imported KEYS are not yet trusted by =
me). Md5/sha1 are also ok.

I also downloaded source zips and built/tested using ANT - passed.

So a +1 from myself as a non-PMC member.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 12:46 AM
> To: general@lucene.apache.org; java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Lucene Java 2.9.2 and 3.0.1 release artifacts
>=20
> Hallo Folks,
>=20
> I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.2 and 3.0.1
> (which both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release
> announcement), build from revision 910082 of the corresponding
> branches. Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your
> votes until Thursday morning, as the scheduled release date for both
> versions is Friday, Feb 19th, 2010. Only votes from Lucene PMC are
> binding, but everyone
> is welcome to check the release candidate and voice their approval or
> disapproval. The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are
> cast.
>=20
> We planned the parallel release with one announcement because of their
> parallel development / bug fix level to emphasize that they are equal
> except deprecation removal and Java 5 since major version 3.
>=20
> Please also read the attached release announcement (Open Document) and
> send it corrected back if you miss anything or want to improve my bad
> English :-)
>=20
> You find the artifacts here:
> =
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-292-301-take1-
> rev910082/
>=20
> Maven repo:
> =
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-292-301-take1-
> rev910082/maven/
>=20
> The changes are here:
> =
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-292-301-take1-
> rev910082/changes-2.9.2/Changes.html
> =
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-292-301-take1-
> rev910082/changes-2.9.2/Contrib-Changes.html
>=20
> =
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-292-301-take1-
> rev910082/changes-3.0.1/Changes.html
> =
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-292-301-take1-
> rev910082/changes-3.0.1/Contrib-Changes.html
>=20
> Uwe
>=20
> =3D=3D=3D Proposed Release Announcement =3D=3D=3D
>=20
> Hello Lucene users,
>=20
> On behalf of the Lucene development community I would like to announce
> the release of Lucene Java versions 3.0.1 and 2.9.2:
>=20
> Both releases fix bugs in the previous versions, where 2.9.2 is the
> last release working with Java 1.4, still providing all deprecated =
APIs
> of the Lucene Java 2.x series. 3.0.1 has the same bug fix level, but
> requires Java 5 and is no longer compatible with code using deprecated
> APIs. The API was cleaned up to make use of Java 5's generics, =
varargs,
> enums, and autoboxing. New users of Lucene are advised to use version
> 3.0.1 for new developments, because it has a clean, type safe new API.
> Users upgrading from 2.9.x can now remove unnecessary casts and add
> generics to their code, too.
>=20
> Important improvements in these releases are a increased maximum =
number
> of unique terms in each index segment. They also add fixes in
> IndexWriter=E2=80=99s commit and lost document deletes in near =
real-time
> indexing. Also lots of bugs in Contrib=E2=80=99s Analyzers package =
were fixed.
> Additionally, the 3.0.1 release restored some public methods, that get
> lost during deprecation removal. If you are using Lucene in a web
> application environment, you will notice that the new Attribute-based
> TokenStream API now works correct with different class loaders.
> Both releases are fully compatible with the corresponding previous
> versions. We strongly recommend upgrading to 2.9.2 if you are using
> 2.9.1 or 2.9.0; and to 3.0.1 if you are using 3.0.0.
>=20
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>=20