lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for Nutch/Solr/Lucene?
Date Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:53:56 GMT
You would still be able to. I still have some misgivings too, but this 
should not be one of them. Lucene would still exist without Solr for 
those that don't use Solr.

On 02/26/2010 04:44 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> -1, I dont use Solr, I still want to be able to use Lucene without any Solr bloat! I
tend to Marvin's comment.
>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
>    
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:marvin@rectangular.com]
>> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 10:24 PM
>> To: general@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Factor out a standalone, shared analysis package for
>> Nutch/Solr/Lucene?
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>      
>>> I think this is a good idea!  LuSolr ;)  (kidding)
>>>
>>> I agree with all of your points Yonik.
>>>
>>> What do other people think...?
>>>        
>> My ideal would be to go the opposite direction: shrink Lucene to a
>> minimal
>> specification, and put all serious functionality into plugins.
>>
>> On the other hand, making giant bloatware official policy seems like
>> the
>> natural progression for Lucene. ;)
>>
>> Marvin Humphrey
>>      
>
>    


-- 
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com




Mime
View raw message