From general-return-1928-apmail-lucene-general-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org Tue Dec 29 23:59:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43981 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2009 23:59:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Dec 2009 23:59:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 78596 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2009 23:59:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 78520 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2009 23:59:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 78510 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2009 23:59:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:59:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gsiasf@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.184] (HELO mail-yw0-f184.google.com) (209.85.211.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:58:58 +0000 Received: by ywh14 with SMTP id 14so10947077ywh.20 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:58:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=BKoCu363ylul+NUjj4ysE6AXtikoBmGTA2JLfj9z/Ls=; b=eWkBh7Q60s6fPMxNL+1RBGH1ggQJAuQJq8ctATdHBy6MavOAC17rYobhUeVujDIfoA gt50Nkn2kqfcW62C8YPUUZgPQKahC4nr+Wzs/SbHWzJbijux4p43hc7oVGGfvS/6OnWB oO0z6CyoFUqea3jKO5QK2qksI7RyjnBBrRtjw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=JSfUBe+Y7gNjvTaHL6aVflU8pwzM+wdpsJ/vSJFsVqPiFazEkfyt48sAZ9RlXMn98O hkHus30B76Pfq9+aDPCWZZgO7eKwRF3iVuIvtqCpKwDxVsOoMVJZYq7z8RZuPOCkZl/q 61OCeyIxVFgd9C620IXqtu1OfTeXlE5iGQUlg= Received: by 10.100.208.1 with SMTP id f1mr18394417ang.108.1262131117134; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:58:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.0.77? (adsl-065-013-152-164.sip.rdu.bellsouth.net [65.13.152.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm5262910yxd.62.2009.12.29.15.58.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:58:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: Grant Ingersoll Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: [spatial] Cartesian "Tiers" nomenclature From: Grant Ingersoll In-Reply-To: <1e33aedb0912291448y421d0619la8a6fac206f83417@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:58:35 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <282F5B70-F10F-407D-8057-A2C2BB2CB896@apache.org> References: <1e33aedb0912282125k2f6dc673u98584f8ea24854c3@mail.gmail.com> <1e33aedb0912282349y48628cb8q7ddf9e24d4ad1d77@mail.gmail.com> <24ED15CB-2E08-40E8-BBF7-7ABA758AEABF@apache.org> <1e33aedb0912290854je7e6734m4f8d2d04acd44fba@mail.gmail.com> <20091229183211.GA8740@rectangular.com> <1e33aedb0912291114y75010ac5mf6d3813196346d6e@mail.gmail.com> <1e33aedb0912291327w18175f2ci2408be83b6fd9b98@mail.gmail.com> <106A8228-4207-4551-BE72-24B6E44CAAB6@gmail.com> <1e33aedb0912291448y421d0619la8a6fac206f83417@mail.gmail.com> To: general@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 29, 2009, at 5:48 PM, patrick o'leary wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> Not really. The community has made a commitment to provide spatial >> capabilities in Lucene/Solr. It's important the community provide >> code/documentation that people can understand and easily find other >> information about the concept. >>=20 >=20 > Even if it's incorrect... I see, well it is Apache licensed, and the = license > allows you to do as you wish How did we get from no clear consensus, i.e. : patrick o'leary wrote: >> If you look at it closer: >> - To programmers there's a quadtree implementation >> - To web users who use maps these are grids / tiles. >> - To GIS experts this is a form of multi-resolution raster-ing. >> - To astrophysicists these are tiers. >> - To the MS folks I've talked to they have quad something or other. >> - To math folks Cartesian levels makes sense. to incorrect?=