lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Willnauer <simon.willna...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [spatial] Cartesian "Tiers" nomenclature
Date Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:22:58 GMT
I would extremely prefer a common well know name instead of Cartensian
tiers. While the API is still in flux changing the name is not that
much of a deal either. Either grid or tiles is fine for me though
while I would prefer the most common of the two - grid seems to be the
better choice though. Yet, should we stick to Cartesian?!

simon

On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org> wrote:
> As some of you may know, I've been working pretty heavily on spatial stuff lately.  One
of the things that has bothered me for a while is the use of the terminology: cartesian tiers.
 The thing is, I can't find any reference to such a thing in any place other than Local Lucene
and Patrick's white paper on it.  Most GIS systems seem to either talk about grids or tiles
when describing this capability.
>
> Do you think it is worth a name change?  This is about to get baked into Solr and I
would really prefer we choose names that the rest of the world seems to understand.
>
> Thanks,
> Grant

Mime
View raw message