lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [spatial] Cartesian "Tiers" nomenclature
Date Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:58:35 GMT

On Dec 29, 2009, at 5:48 PM, patrick o'leary wrote:

>> 
>> 
>> Not really.  The community has made a commitment to provide spatial
>> capabilities in Lucene/Solr.  It's important the community provide
>> code/documentation that people can understand and easily find other
>> information about the concept.
>> 
> 
> Even if it's incorrect... I see, well it is Apache licensed, and the license
> allows you to do as you wish

How did we get from no clear consensus, i.e. :

patrick o'leary wrote:
>> If you look at it closer:
>> - To programmers there's a quadtree implementation
>> - To web users who use maps these are grids / tiles.
>> - To GIS experts this is a form of multi-resolution raster-ing.
>> - To astrophysicists these are tiers.
>> - To the MS folks I've talked to they have quad something or other.
>> - To math folks Cartesian levels makes sense.

 to incorrect?
Mime
View raw message