lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "patrick o'leary" <pj...@pjaol.com>
Subject Re: [spatial] Cartesian "Tiers" nomenclature
Date Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:48:43 GMT
>
>
> Not really.  The community has made a commitment to provide spatial
> capabilities in Lucene/Solr.  It's important the community provide
> code/documentation that people can understand and easily find other
> information about the concept.
>

Even if it's incorrect... I see, well it is Apache licensed, and the license
allows you to do as you wish



On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsiasf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Dec 29, 2009, at 4:27 PM, patrick o'leary wrote:
>
> >>
> >> My only issue is that I can't find a single reference to that phrase
> >> outside of Local Lucene whereas I can find lots of references to the
> concept
> >> under names like: map tiles, map grids, spatial tiles, or just plain
> >> tiles/grids.
> >>
> > That doesn't mean cartesian tiers isn't a better description and that if
> >> Lucene was the first to implement such a thing we wouldn't even be
> having
> >> this conversation
> >>
> >
> > Then perhaps spatial-lucene isn't the product for you? That is always an
> > option
> >
>
> Not really.  The community has made a commitment to provide spatial
> capabilities in Lucene/Solr.  It's important the community provide
> code/documentation that people can understand and easily find other
> information about the concept.
>
> -Grant

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message