lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
Date Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:11:10 GMT
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Bill Au <bill.w.au@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think someone has already pointed this out before.  On numerous occasions
> I have had to dig into the Lucene code when writing code to extend Solr.  So
> it will be much earier to make sure that I am looking at the right code if
> Solr uses an official release of Lucene, as opposed to a particular SVN
> revision.

And it's much easier for people to use a Solr release if we could
actually *release* one!!!
But yes, it looks like we will spin a new Solr release.

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com


> Bill
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Yeah, unfortunately, I think we need to use the new Jars.
>>
>>
>> On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>
>>  On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, it's too bad!
>>>>
>>>> But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing?
>>>> Because it would not be good to have jar files with version 2.9.1 in the
>>>> package that are not the officially released 2.9.1 artifacts.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Darn... forgot about the version number in the jars.
>>> Sigh.
>>>
>>> -Yonik
>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com

Mime
View raw message