lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [ACUS09] Proposed Schedule
Date Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:58:07 GMT
I am one of those people who was first bitten by range queries, but
eventually learned to live with them.  Somewhat.

There are also people who have nearly been driven to drink by trying to do
this as well.

Three cheers for the Trie* stuff making it much easier to consider these
possibilities.

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Yonik Seeley <yseeley@gmail.com> wrote:

>  > (we know all possibilities we have now by
> > numeric/geo search).
>
> Let's not over-state the case: people have been doing all that for
> years with Lucene.  There were many methods to deal with numeric
> encoding and slow range queries.  The Trie* stuff has made it both
> easier and faster out-of-the-box - a good thing.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message