lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edoardo Marcora <edoardo.marc...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: Boolean query with 50,000 clauses! Possible? Scalable?
Date Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:27:00 GMT

Thanx for your prompt reply. Being a total noob on this, do you mind if I ask
you how would I change this to a filter?

Cheers,


Uwe Schindler wrote:
> 
> I would change this to a Filter. BooleanQueries are not scalable this way
> and will take very long time.
> 
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
> 
>> From: Edoardo Marcora [mailto:edoardo.marcora@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 10:14 AM
>> To: general@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Boolean query with 50,000 clauses! Possible? Scalable?
>> 
>> 
>> I am faced with the requirement for a boolean query composed of 50,000
>> clauses (all of them directed at the same field) all OR'ed together.
>> 
>> I know that maxClauseCount can be set arbitrarily, but I am wondering
>> whether this kind of query would chock and how scalable are this kind of
>> queries (time/memory).
>> 
>> Thank you in advance for your help and consideration
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Boolean-query-with-
>> 50%2C000-clauses%21-Possible--Scalable--tp24664839p24664839.html
>> Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Boolean-query-with-50%2C000-clauses%21-Possible--Scalable--tp24664839p24665291.html
Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message