lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <>
Subject Re: Open Relevance Infrastucture Request
Date Wed, 27 May 2009 10:35:17 GMT
James, Ted,

Ted's estimates sound reasonable to me.  One of the responses on  
infra@ suggested we might find a few mirrors who can help lend a  
hand.  Let's keep in touch on this and see how it works out.  If we  
have a mirroring approach in place, then the need for even project  
committers having write access goes away as we can manage writes here  
at the ASF and you could just sync.

I have no clue about bandwidth provided issue, especially b/c this is  
a unique situation.  We can find out as we proceed.


On May 26, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:

> Grant is the spark-plug here.
> I would predict < 10TB of transfer per month backed by 200-300GB of
> storage.  File sizes would probably be in the 50-100MB range  
> organized into
> larger groups.  Access would be probably be read-only except for  
> Lucene
> committers.
> Others would have to comment on a "bandwidth provided by" link, but  
> it seems
> that this already exists (see 
> .

View raw message