lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] New Lucene committers and PMC members require 3 +1 votes to pass
Date Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:30:22 GMT
I didn't include general@ only because I am a noob - copied now. I see a net
+3, and if that doesn't change soon, we should consider it settled going
forward. Apologies for belaboring this especially as I have only been on the
list a few days.

On Apr 15, 2009 9:42 AM, "Jukka Zitting" <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com> wrote: > In
this new thread I simply...
+0 I think the standard majority rule for procedural issues is good
enough, but I'm just as fine with requiring a clearer majority.
Especially as people seem to prefer that.

PS. Why not have this vote on general@?

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message