Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87489 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2009 18:06:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2009 18:06:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 13612 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2009 18:06:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 13541 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2009 18:06:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 13508 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2009 18:06:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:06:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.69.42.181] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (208.69.42.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:06:39 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 0FF1B71C0F4; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216BD71C18A; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:06:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter To: Andi Vajda cc: general@lucene.apache.org, pylucene-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] release PyLucene 2.4.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <9BC0416C-96F8-4771-9EFB-192A2B22BCDC@mikemccandless.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org : This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by : avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I : moved all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn I'm not advocating duplication -- and i agree HTML based docs tend to be easier to read. I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of the other subprojects do) -Hoss