Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33593 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2009 08:18:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2009 08:18:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 34666 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2009 08:18:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-general-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 34641 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2009 08:18:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 34630 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2009 08:18:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:18:14 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.168] (HELO mail-fx0-f168.google.com) (209.85.220.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:18:06 +0000 Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so685244fxm.5 for ; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:17:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=n56hL2+r6tf2YmGE24Ula/V7Hw5EK0QmF8TjJsIWak0=; b=GtwBz02WpAz5GhqOyEIi1b2EpnetHCgAyIs7APFx/bh7O/g+FkWbATLOIy7bgBAT8i L2H8XwUUfNXzpPpO+9qgFEDQpAxmKkv3IX7xeIJNSoOhVZY4qujyhA8Wqb5okZ8OIE88 7a/na7uT+0A4hSJC2dLaJK2OVRncW7bRDyBzY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KfsmLFjPw/mrHfIKr0guJ/ocDJyCLnBKAd4XY5BGvYDmZcXj1gggi2Jb80gviEBKOP tGQyuJazrSdvE42M5nZ9J69yHgwnvvMgH9xJKtBMHL9KbHZnRs1giQxVjqVFF7q1VfvD wYRyaprQX7XLKcOGuDUORoZLkk5wh7qDkTcpk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.181.51.14 with SMTP id d14mr1122704bkk.4.1236413866616; Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:17:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <65d3176c0903062234o689bcd4geeabd6209c3ee0b2@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090306215814.GA9277@rectangular.com> <510143ac0903061802t1f3fdb6ek6eada1212059d1f0@mail.gmail.com> <65d3176c0903062234o689bcd4geeabd6209c3ee0b2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 09:17:46 +0100 Message-ID: <510143ac0903070017x2241cba2h298dde14d03a0130@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Archive Lucy From: Jukka Zitting To: general@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Nathan Kurz wrote: > I don't know the exact distinction, but to a reasonable approximation > KinoSearch can be viewed as the Perl bindings on top of the alpha > version of Lucy. That's not Lucy code until it's being developed in Lucy. And without Lucy code it's pretty pointless to have a Lucy project. > The vast majority of the work is done in the C portion of the code, > and my understanding is that once this separation is complete and > the API is more final, the C codebase will be renamed Lucy. Any larger externally developed codebase can only be imported to Apache through incubation or a software grant, and the software grant can only be used if there exists an active community that wants to take over the development of that code. The latter is not true (there is no active community) at the moment in Lucy, so at this point any code from KinoSearch would need to go through full incubation. This is which is why I suggested the idea of KinoSearch being brought to the Incubator. BR, Jukka Zitting