lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Mahout 0.1
Date Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:36:20 GMT
Jukka,

I get:

 > md5 mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz
MD5 (mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz) = f7341a0eb773d9f96ea87914f3c845dc

  >cat mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz.md5
f7341a0eb773d9f96ea87914f3c845dc

 > cat mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz.sha1
5c84eb607c07119aceb1f3824e38205474dabc08

 > openssl sha1 mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz
SHA1(mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz)=  
5c84eb607c07119aceb1f3824e38205474dabc08

Am I doing something wrong?  Seems like everything is right.  This  
stuff is all done automatically by Maven.  I downloaded those files  
today from http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/staging-repo/mahout/org/apache/mahout/mahout/0.1/

-Grant

On Mar 30, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Grant Ingersoll  
> <gsingers@apache.org> wrote:
>> Please review and vote for releasing Mahout 0.1.
>
> -1 I'm getting conflicting checksums for the mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz
> package that I'm using to review the sources. The checksums of my
> download are:
>
>    MD5: f7341a0eb773d9f96ea87914f3c845dc
>    SHA1: 5c84eb607c07119aceb1f3824e38205474dabc08
>
> But the .md5 and .sha1 files claim the following:
>
>    MD5: 46fd344aa6e88b7943e988dddaccd121
>    SHA1: 5b8bd6840718d2546b93656a3cc1528e7dfda75d
>
> I'm still getting test errors on Windows, but now I also built the
> release candidate on my Linux desktop where Mahout core passes all
> tests. Note however the issues MAHOUT-112 and MAHOUT-113 which I
> encountered in the taste-web and examples modules.
>
> Other than those the release looks good. Thanks for resolving some of
> the issues I raised earlier. I'd be willing to vote +1 even without a
> new release candidate if the checksum issues can be tracked down and
> fixed. The PGP signatures seem to be correct.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting



Mime
View raw message