lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu>
Subject RE: documentation for V1.0.2
Date Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:54:43 GMT
2.3.0 included some serious indexing speed improvements - reports indicate 2 to 8 times faster
indexing.

FYI, version 2.4.0 is the most recent release.

Steve

On 10/17/2008 at 3:46 PM, ChadDavis wrote:
> I'm working on a system that is using Lucene 1.0.2  I'm a
> contractor, so,
> while I'm encrouging there immediate upgrade, I'm not able to
> make them to
> so.
> 
> They have huge indexing performance issues.  I would guess
> there's some
> pretty drastic differences between 1.0.2 and 2.3, eh?
> 
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Steven A Rowe
> <sarowe@syr.edu> wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, looking closer, I see that release 1.02 *was* referred to as 1.0.2
> > - see Lucene's home page as of July 2002:
> > 
> > <
> > 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/docs/index.html
> ?revision=149779&pathrev=149912
> > > 
> > 
> > The contents of the above-linked page are included here, in part:
> > 
> >   12 June 2002 - Lucene 1.2 Final Released
> >   
> >   The Lucene Team is proud to announce the release of Lucene 1.2.
> >   This is the first production release of Lucene since it moved
> >   to the Apache project. This release contains many features and
> >   bug fixes over the previous 1.0.2 release - see CHANGES.txt for
> >   details. Binary and source distributions are available here.
> >   
> >   Lucene v1.02 released
> >   
> >   This release repackages Lucene as a product of the Apache
> >   Software Foundation. Download it here.
> > 
> > But neither "1.02" nor "1.0.2" is mentioned in CHANGES.txt, which was
> > first committed to the repository in November 2001, after the 1.2
> > release candidate series had started - here's the first version of
> > CHANGES.txt:
> > 
> > <
> > 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/CHANGES.txt?rev
> ision=149623
> > > 
> > 
> > Although there is a tagged directory in the Subversion repository for
> > release "1.01", I don't see one for "1.02"/"1.0.2".  If you *really*
> > need this, you could probably recover it by searching the Apache
> > mailing list archives for the 1.02 release announcement, and then check
> > out the state of the repository on that date.  Sounds like fun :).
> > 
> > My guess, given the "production release" wording from the July 2002
> > home page, is that the 1.0.2 release was not worthy of the term
> > "production".
> > 
> > Out of curiosity, why do you need documentation for version 1.0.2?
> > 
> > Steve
> > 
> > On 10/17/2008 at 1:54 PM, ChadDavis wrote:
> > > Thanks for the help, and pointing me to the right mailing list ;)
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Steven A Rowe
> > > <sarowe@syr.edu> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Chad,
> > > > 
> > > > Not too many people watch the general@l.a.o list - much more traffic
> > > > over on java-user@l.a.o.
> > > > 
> > > > Lucene didn't use a patch version number until 1.4.X - before then,
> > > > releases were called "release candidates", e.g. "1.2 rc1", "1.2
> > > > final".
> > > > 
> > > > My guess is that you're looking for one of the 1.2 releases; the
> > > > first Lucene release under the Apache Jakarta project, after the move
> > > > from Sourceforge, was initially referred to as "1.02".
> > > > 
> > > > However, AFAICT from looking at CHANGES.txt, the "1.02" name was
> > > > changed to "1.2", with a series of release candidates starting in
> > > > October 2001, culminating in "1.2 rc6", a.k.a. "1.2 final", in June
> > > > 2002.
> > > > 
> > > > You can see the 1.2 series in the tag directories under the link
> > > > Grant mentioned.
> > > > 
> > > > Steve
> > > > 
> > > > On 10/17/2008 at 1:22 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> > > > > I think you'd have to dig into the SVN archive:
> > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/
> > > > > 
> > > > > Although, I don't see 1.0.2 there.  That was pre my time in
> > > > > Lucene, so
> > > > > not sure.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Oct 16, 2008, at 3:49 PM, ChadDavis wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Where can I get doc for 1.0.2?  The lucene site
> apparently only
> > goes
> > > > > > back to 1.4.3
> > > > > 
> > > > > -------------------------- Grant Ingersoll Lucene Boot Camp Training
> > > > > Nov. 3-4, 2008, ApacheCon US New Orleans.
> > > > > http://www.lucenebootcamp.com
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Lucene Helpful Hints:
> > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
> > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
> > 
>

 


Mime
View raw message