lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ChadDavis <chadmichaelda...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: documentation for V1.0.2
Date Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:46:29 GMT
I'm working on a system that is using Lucene 1.0.2  I'm a contractor, so,
while I'm encrouging there immediate upgrade, I'm not able to make them to
so.

They have huge indexing performance issues.  I would guess there's some
pretty drastic differences between 1.0.2 and 2.3, eh?

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Steven A Rowe <sarowe@syr.edu> wrote:

> Hmm, looking closer, I see that release 1.02 *was* referred to as 1.0.2 -
> see Lucene's home page as of July 2002:
>
> <
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/docs/index.html?revision=149779&pathrev=149912
> >
>
> The contents of the above-linked page are included here, in part:
>
>   12 June 2002 - Lucene 1.2 Final Released
>
>   The Lucene Team is proud to announce the release of Lucene 1.2.
>   This is the first production release of Lucene since it moved
>   to the Apache project. This release contains many features and
>   bug fixes over the previous 1.0.2 release - see CHANGES.txt for
>   details. Binary and source distributions are available here.
>
>   Lucene v1.02 released
>
>   This release repackages Lucene as a product of the Apache
>   Software Foundation. Download it here.
>
> But neither "1.02" nor "1.0.2" is mentioned in CHANGES.txt, which was first
> committed to the repository in November 2001, after the 1.2 release
> candidate series had started - here's the first version of CHANGES.txt:
>
> <
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/CHANGES.txt?revision=149623
> >
>
> Although there is a tagged directory in the Subversion repository for
> release "1.01", I don't see one for "1.02"/"1.0.2".  If you *really* need
> this, you could probably recover it by searching the Apache mailing list
> archives for the 1.02 release announcement, and then check out the state of
> the repository on that date.  Sounds like fun :).
>
> My guess, given the "production release" wording from the July 2002 home
> page, is that the 1.0.2 release was not worthy of the term "production".
>
> Out of curiosity, why do you need documentation for version 1.0.2?
>
> Steve
>
> On 10/17/2008 at 1:54 PM, ChadDavis wrote:
> > Thanks for the help, and pointing me to the right mailing list ;)
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Steven A Rowe
> > <sarowe@syr.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Chad,
> > >
> > > Not too many people watch the general@l.a.o list - much more traffic
> > > over on java-user@l.a.o.
> > >
> > > Lucene didn't use a patch version number until 1.4.X - before then,
> > > releases were called "release candidates", e.g. "1.2 rc1", "1.2 final".
> > >
> > > My guess is that you're looking for one of the 1.2 releases; the first
> > > Lucene release under the Apache Jakarta project, after the move from
> > > Sourceforge, was initially referred to as "1.02".
> > >
> > > However, AFAICT from looking at CHANGES.txt, the "1.02" name was
> > > changed to "1.2", with a series of release candidates starting in
> > > October 2001, culminating in "1.2 rc6", a.k.a. "1.2 final", in June
> > > 2002.
> > >
> > > You can see the 1.2 series in the tag directories under the link Grant
> > > mentioned.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > On 10/17/2008 at 1:22 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> > > > I think you'd have to dig into the SVN archive:
> > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/
> > > >
> > > > Although, I don't see 1.0.2 there.  That was pre my time in
> > > > Lucene, so
> > > > not sure.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Oct 16, 2008, at 3:49 PM, ChadDavis wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Where can I get doc for 1.0.2?  The lucene site apparently only
> goes
> > > > > back to 1.4.3
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------- Grant Ingersoll Lucene Boot Camp Training
> > > > Nov. 3-4, 2008, ApacheCon US New Orleans.
> http://www.lucenebootcamp.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Lucene Helpful Hints:
> > > > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
> > > > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message