lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Local Lucene and Local Solr
Date Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:11:49 GMT
OK, I have completed the software grant for Local Lucene.  See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387

At this point, there needs to be one or more volunteers to pick up  
doing the work via patches on the issue.

-Grant


On Sep 2, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:

> So, the consensus seems to be to split into contrib modules for  
> Lucene Java and Lucene Solr.  I just need to finish up the paperwork  
> over in incubation and then I think we can seek out volunteers on  
> the two lists to do the splitting in conjunction with the people  
> donating the code.
>
> -Grant
>
> On Aug 25, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>>
>> : As to where, from the Solr point of view, a geosearch feature seems
>> : core, thus it should go in Solr core.
>>
>> if i remember correctly,the LocalSolr has been designed/built as a
>> "plugin" so it doesn't actually need to live in the "core" Solr  
>> code base
>> ... it can be a Solr contrib ... but i agree it would probably  
>> makethe
>> most sense for "Local Lucene" to be a Lucene-Java contrib and  
>> "Local Solr"
>> to be a Solr contrib ... haveing a seperate "Geo" subproject might  
>> make
>> sense from a code management standpoint, but not really from a
>> dependency/release management or user base standpoint ... either  
>> people want to use
>> LocalLucene directly (in which case they don't care about the Solr  
>> pieces)
>> or they care about using Local Solr (and don't know they care about  
>> the
>> Lucene piece)
>>
>>
>> -Hoss
>>


Mime
View raw message