lucene-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: lucene / clucene
Date Wed, 25 May 2005 18:48:17 GMT
lucene4c is a baby still.  You should ask about CLucene on the CLucene
list.  Somebody just asked about that... maybe it was you :)

CLucene folks still seem to want to join Lucene at Apache.

Otis

--- John Paige <paige.john@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have looked at Lucene4C, it looks to me that it is in a very early
> stage of devlopment. There are not any releases yet.
> Does anyone have any idea when the first official release is going to
> be out?
> 
> Thanks,
> John
> 
> On 5/24/05, Erik Hatcher <erik@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
> > John,
> > 
> > There are a couple of other options beyond CLucene.  There is also
> > Lucene4C which is now being developed in the Apache Incubator
> > (incubator.apache.org) and using a GCJ'd version of Lucene.  The
> Java
> > version of Lucene has been integrated into PyLucene using the Java
> ->
> > GCJ -> SWIG.
> > 
> >      Erik
> > 
> > On May 24, 2005, at 11:47 AM, John Paige wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >    I have heard good reviews about lucene, since we use C++
> interface,
> > > I discarded the idea of using lucene. Recently, I came across
> > > "clucene", lucene written in C++.
> > >
> > > clucene is not as well-supported as lucene, so I am not sure if I
> > > should go for it. Does anyone has used clucene here? Any comments
> on
> > > effictiveness, support on clucene are highly appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > John
> > >
> > 
> >
> 

Mime
View raw message