LUCENE-9005 is committed.
> On 16 Oct 2019, at 17:12, Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com <mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>>
wrote:
>
> SOLR-13835 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13835> is also almost there.
>
> Jan Høydahl
>
>> 16. okt. 2019 kl. 16:53 skrev Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <mailto:jpountz@gmail.com>>:
>>
>> Hi Ishan,
>>
>> LUCENE-8920 needs more work indeed, but it is not blocking this release.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:54 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>> <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com <mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Here are the issues that remain to be resolved for 8.3.
>>>
>>> LUCENE-8920: Committed, but not resolved. More work remains?
>>> LUCENE-9005: Patch available, not committed.
>>> SOLR-13677: Patch available, not committed. Need another day to
>>> complete cleanup and tests.
>>>
>>> I'll wait until all of them are finished and then proceed to build the RC1.
>>> Thanks and regards,
>>> Ishan
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 2:58 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>>> <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com <mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sure, Noble, thanks! Next time, please use a single commit to revert
>>>> such features (you just used up 3 commits). branch_8_3's history is
>>>> now littered with SOLR-13821 commits and reverts that shouldn't have
>>>> been there :-)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Jan!
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:17 AM Noble Paul <noble.paul@gmail.com <mailto:noble.paul@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I'll revert the package store commits related to SOLR-13821 in the 8.3
>>>>> branch. It is supposed to be used by the (SOLR-13822) and it is not a
>>>>> part of the 8.3 release.
>>>>> --Noble
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 5:22 AM Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com <mailto:jpountz@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ishan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release is no longer blocked on LUCENE-8920.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:18 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>>>>>> <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com <mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1, Ignacio. Please feel free to do the needful, I'll wait until
this is resolved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1, Jan. Sure, I think we should get it in!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Oct, 2019, 5:45 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh, <caomanhdat317@gmail.com
<mailto:caomanhdat317@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Ishan,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I pushed the fix to branch_8_3.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:27 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com
<mailto:jan.asf@cominvent.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ishan, I'd like to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13665
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13665> included, since without it Solr won't
work with SSL against Zookeeper.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
>>>>>>>>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com <http://www.cominvent.com/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 10. okt. 2019 kl. 11:45 skrev Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com
<mailto:iverase@gmail.com>>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Ishan,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for taking care of the release. We have a blocker
in Lucene (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8920 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8920>).
I remember that was an issue for the 8.2.0 release and it was reverted and naked as a blocker
for this release. Maybe we should completely reverted until we have a better solution? let
see what Mike thinks about it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ignacio
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 4:51 PM Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de
<mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I also had a customer complaining about this. I have
the feeling it also happens from time to time during inter node comm, which uses solrj, too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Uwe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am October 9, 2019 1:38:00 PM UTC schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya
<ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com <mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1, Dat! Please go ahead.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct, 2019, 2:33 PM Andrzej Białecki,
<ab@getopt.org <mailto:ab@getopt.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s marked as Minor in Jira, but after
reading the description it sounds scary - IMHO it should be at least well investigated before
8.3 in order to determine whether it causes real damage (apart from looking scary and filling
the logs).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9 Oct 2019, at 10:48, Đạt Cao Mạnh
<caomanhdat317@gmail.com <mailto:caomanhdat317@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ishan, guys
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to include the fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13293
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13293> in this release. Hoping that is ok!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:02 PM Uwe Schindler
<uwe@thetaphi.de <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ASF Jenkins Jobs also reconfigured.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I left the 8.2 Refguide job in the queue
(I cloned it), not sure if that one is still needed. All other jobs are 8.3 now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uwe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de
<mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:49
PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: 8.3 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Policeman Jenkins builds and tests
8.3 for Windows and Linux.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uwe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de <mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com
<mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019
4:32 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org
<mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org>>; Uwe Schindler
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <uschindler@apache.org <mailto:uschindler@apache.org>>;
Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com <mailto:sarowe@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: 8.3 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cut the 8.3 branch. Please
feel free to push in any bug fix. For
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any feature, please let me know
to see how we can accommodate it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> safely.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm planning to get myself familiarized
with what I need to do for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ref guide release (simultaneously
with the binary release). So, most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely, I'll be able to build
artifacts in another week's time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Uwe Schindler / @Steve Rowe
would it be possible to please create a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins branch for 8.3?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ishan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 4:17 PM
Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com
<mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll cut the branch in 12-24
hours from now. If someone has anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to put into branch_8x now,
please feel free.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If someone has a non-bugfix
issue that they want to push in to 8.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after the branch cut, but
you're sure it will not disrupt the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stability of the release,
please let me know and we can discuss on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case-by-case basis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:50
PM Mikhail Khludnev <mkhl@apache.org <mailto:mkhl@apache.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Excuse me. I have to
recall this message regarding SOLR-13764.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019
at 10:56 PM Mikhail Khludnev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ggedel@gmail.com <mailto:ggedel@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ishan, thanks for
update.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> May I propose to
hold it for this week, beside of the severe issues you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned, I'd like to drop pretty
neat JSON Query parser for Interval
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Queries https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13764
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13764> this week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 30 сент.
2019 г., 18:04 Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com
<mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Due to some
unfinished and half merged work in SOLR-13661, we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a difficult position
for a branch cutting today (as I had proposed).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have documented
the options on how to deal with that immediately
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that issue. I'll
work to resolve the situation and cut a branch as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon as possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * SOLR-13677
is also a blocker for release, but I can proceed with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch cutting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll take a look
at the ref guide's simultaneous release as we reach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closer to building
the artifacts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ishan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18,
2019 at 9:06 PM Cassandra Targett
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <casstargett@gmail.com <mailto:casstargett@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I’ve
mentioned to some of you over the past couple of weeks, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to propose that we don’t
“release” the Ref Guide at all the way we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been doing it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It deserves
a separate thread, which since it’s come up a few times
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this week I should start now,
but in essence, my idea is to no longer treat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PDF as a release artifact that
requires a vote, and publish the HTML as our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> primary version of the Ref Guide
in effectively the same way we publish the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> javadocs (at the same time as
the binary artifacts).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead of
highjacking this thread with that discussion since it has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> several aspects, let me send
another mail on it where I can flesh it out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and we can discuss there. I have
the mail mostly queued up and ready to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cassandra
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18,
2019, 10:23 AM -0500, Gus Heck
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <gus.heck@gmail.com <mailto:gus.heck@gmail.com>>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I learned
recently that it's actually all documented here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/how-to-contribute.html#ref-
<https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/how-to-contribute.html#ref->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guide-publication-process
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep
17, 2019 at 7:31 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com
<mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Adrien,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed,
meant to write about starting a vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Gus,
I'll have to let Cassandra weigh in on this one as I'm not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> familiar with the ref guide release
process.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ishan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon,
16 Sep, 2019, 7:28 PM Adrien Grand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jpountz@gmail.com <mailto:jpountz@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
to start working on 8.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did
you mean "start a vote" when you wrote "release the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifacts"? It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> got
me wondering because I don't think we frequently managed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
cutting a branch to releasing artifacts in so little time in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On
Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com
<mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We have a lot of unreleased features and fixes. I propose that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
a 8.3 branch in two weeks (in order to have sufficient time to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bake in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
all in-progress features). If there are no objections to doing so, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
can volunteer for the release as an RM and plan for cutting a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
branch on 30 September (and release the artifacts about 3-4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
that).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ishan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adrien
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To
unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For
additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com
<http://www.needhamsoftware.com/> (work)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com
<http://www.the111shift.com/> (play)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe,
e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional
commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mikhail Khludnev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
<mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
<mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
<mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
<mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cao Mạnh Đạt
>>>>>>>>>>>> E-mail: caomanhdat317@gmail.com <mailto:caomanhdat317@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>>>>>>> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de <https://www.thetaphi.de/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Cao Mạnh Đạt
>>>>>>>> E-mail: caomanhdat317@gmail.com <mailto:caomanhdat317@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Adrien
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Noble Paul
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
>>
|