From dev-return-360744-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Thu Jun 27 14:33:03 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0497C180607 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:33:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 43365 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2019 14:33:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 43337 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2019 14:33:01 -0000 Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (HELO mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:33:01 +0000 Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 643E5E2C44 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 27F1625449 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:33:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Cassandra Targett (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-13571) Make recent RefGuide rank well in Google MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13571?page=3Dcom.atlassian= .jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1687= 4198#comment-16874198 ]=20 Cassandra Targett commented on SOLR-13571: ------------------------------------------ I'm not totally against the idea of having a "latest", but I don't quite ge= t why it can't be a redirect? My gut reaction is that it further complicate= s the release process, and since I'm pretty much the only one who ever does= it (with one recent exception), I'd like to be very sure that additional s= teps are necessary. I'd be more likely to get on board if you were able to = spell out the specific changes to the release process that this would cause= . Maybe it would be simpler to ask Infra to just change that big list of redi= rects to go to one single page that says "You have a link to the old versio= n of the Ref Guide, here's where the latest versions are." Or just have it = go to https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/. I mean, it's the internet - st= uff moves and life pretty much goes on. Related to that idea, we need to institute a proper 404 page and redirect r= ule for it. There are also a large number of duplicated files in each release - CSS, fo= nts, images. I have been recently thinking I'd like to restructure everythi= ng so we stop uploading things that are very unlikely to change from releas= e-to-release, but that is way beyond the scope here, and I don't have any c= oncrete ideas there yet. I think it's worth asking if the value we'd get here is worth the effort of= more steps to the process and more duplication of content. It's been 3 yea= rs since we moved. I agree that having the 6.6 Guide rank highest is not go= od. But perhaps we can fix that in a simpler way? > Make recent RefGuide rank well in Google > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-13571 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13571 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)=20 > Components: documentation > Reporter: Jan H=C3=B8ydahl > Priority: Major > > Spinoff from SOLR-13548 > The old Confluence ref-guide has a lot of pages pointing to it, and all o= f that link karma is delegated to the {{/solr/guide/6_6/}} html ref guide, = making it often rank top. However we'd want newer content to rank high. See= these comments for some first ideas. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org