From dev-return-360866-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Fri Jun 28 13:04:02 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C956F18062B for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:04:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 71155 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2019 13:04:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 71128 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2019 13:03:59 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:03:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 55624C20E7 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:03:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.801 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.801 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hltu3It221AM for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:03:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lj1-f177.google.com (mail-lj1-f177.google.com [209.85.208.177]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 768FE5F419 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f177.google.com with SMTP id h10so5932595ljg.0 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 06:03:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cRiek19Lc6y2lVukz5RDjx+WRPgk1F2hIWM8dd8miYE=; b=qJMVQNzYD99SU5zY0AnXICBPnyivqhXDrrmlHzgLBz893t1SebOj32Ru2j3EZjsvkN 8ruOT7tujrEmkXRV6QnOH0aPCs/0qa4JxSRTjYqR8Mrj38OzRaMRw0r95u5ESkp8XI0+ VNUQln6PeU24pquijn18SjCHezcBYoAOrO+cX9S2vu8SlTdJlD30iRZi+wU3po908w7P eaFuL4mzQkB2Xz7LDFGAbOaPHJXhDQxa3lrXa/E4kVICSlqUWk47nGGi8i0qUQ3tShfF /TIO3RURZmcNtl0OqknvlBYRPj0NdzuQa2MjzdqGmbJh//spt6IXB+QdqRtlsL/I86Si ozTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=cRiek19Lc6y2lVukz5RDjx+WRPgk1F2hIWM8dd8miYE=; b=ncs83X/vn/nDtXMlhKykxpznMGxh1KkPUKRcOC3vOLvlJXFQmg7+dOdg9DmUC3/vB8 xwnc1CK5CHeJeOy2yi445kx4XhmGdOEus2IFKrCWE9yOJAb9YhuJx0kZ9c+d5vPx5/Lm u0xcuwUuzfpnaGfIk2O5fImR0zjRDJhnALxSHbhRt5F7dW7FZwzXG0reqenBFmR+RTKr aWAC6M8ZdoLx8aU/A7yeaFYZ3OromRScM8sia3Io9BMNHfhng/BbMTFowWWoWIBr7/YR FBY9Ku8iSLcg6QcRPAiXGqIJyuOZZySJsSvD2LHEJ8tN2o4c9fIOfbb2ewidoMPzmv3B BKwA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVT/8+5q5W1/4gxGzymLwfn8P2wc6NpGs/mOuogdFcHrr0pHFA0 oMaUA/TH31l+iQMEI82E2AjNzYzZgHexl5B2j7sH4kpg X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxoerLvjJ8ky7sI+J3ppNq1w+V7s21h+RFk61OI1q4S2lYcuPbAx15exBxhbaUGd49wMN7/s+5spULTbf+p914= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:95d5:: with SMTP id y21mr5910951ljh.84.1561727029962; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 06:03:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4437AFD5-5414-4DBA-A269-F3443EC29AFE@gmail.com> <6A24C0ED-6B62-4A72-AAAA-5AAE2EA08519@getopt.org> In-Reply-To: From: Ignacio Vera Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 15:03:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000db6ac1058c61e815" --000000000000db6ac1058c61e815 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So if there is more time I would like to backport bug fix LUCENE-8831 which is just fixing the hashcode method for LatLonShapeBoundingBox query. Is that ok? On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 12:39 PM Andrzej Bia=C5=82ecki wrot= e: > I just created SOLR-13583 and I=E2=80=99ll be working on a fix. This is a= serious > bug, both in the way it prevents the old collection deletion and it also > may lead to data loss when used with REINDEXCOLLECTION and > removeSource=3Dtrue. > > Unfortunately, my schedule today and over the weekend was already full as > it was, so realistically speaking I can work on this on Monday - unless > someone else bets me to it. > > On 26 Jun 2019, at 17:38, Ignacio Vera wrote: > > I had a look before and I could not find the section 8.1.2 in 8x and > master. I supposed the entry is created once the version is released, so > not sure how to proceed. > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 4:53 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> Thanks Andrezej, >> >> I will do it soon >> >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 4:43 PM Andrzej Bia=C5=82ecki wr= ote: >> >>> Ignacio, I think you need to move the entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt for >>> this issue to the 8.1.2 section, not just in branch_8_1 but consistenly= on >>> master and on branch_8x? >>> >>> On 25 Jun 2019, at 17:02, Ignacio Vera wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to backport bug fix LUCENE-8775 that fixes some failures i= n >>> the polygon Tessellator when a polygon contain a hole sharing a vertex = with >>> the polygon. Is that ok? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Ignacio >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 1:39 AM Steve Rowe wrote: >>> >>>> Hi =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t, I re-enabled the ASF Jenkins 8.1 jobs. - Steve >>>> >>>> On Jun 24, 2019, at 8:09 AM, =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Uwe, Steve. >>>> >>>> Can Jenkins on branch_8_1 be resumed for 8.1.2 release? I am not sure >>>> how to enable them on https://builds.apache.org/view/L/view/Lucene/ >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:51 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sure Dat, sounds good. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 2:11 PM =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi Ishan, >>>>> > >>>>> > If upgrade Jetty seems too much for a bug fix release, I will try t= o >>>>> upgrade only part that affect SOLR-13413 (one module). Then see how t= ests >>>>> will behave then. Does that sound good? >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:51 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Have we vetted all other changes to Jetty? Are we sure that they >>>>> don't introduce a different regression? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Thu, 13 Jun, 2019, 4:16 AM Kevin Risden, >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> +1 to 8.1.2 and the Jetty upgrade. FYI Erick created >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13541 specifically for the >>>>> Jetty upgrade. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Kevin Risden >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 4:47 PM =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh= < >>>>> caomanhdat317@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Hi David, yeah sure, that bug fix seems important. >>>>> >>>> I also want to do the upgrade Jetty 9.4.19 for 8.1.2 (fix: >>>>> SOLR-13413). Do you guys have any objections? >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 3:40 PM David Smiley < >>>>> david.w.smiley@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes thanks for volunteering. Also, lets get this serious bug >>>>> fix in: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13523 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ~ David Smiley >>>>> >>>>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>>> >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:27 AM =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t Cao M=E1=BA=A1= nh < >>>>> caomanhdat317@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Just right after the 8.1.1 release has been published we=E2=80= =99ve >>>>> discovered a serious bug in BasicAuthentication which affect all rele= ased >>>>> versions of Solr including 8.0, 8.1, 8.1.1. Details of the bug can be= found >>>>> in SOLR-13510. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I=E2=80=99m volunteering to do this release, if there are no >>>>> objections, and I=E2=80=99d like to create a RC early next week. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>>> Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t >>>>> >>>>>> E-mail: caomanhdat317@gmail.com >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>> Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t >>>>> >>>> E-mail: caomanhdat317@gmail.com >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Best regards, >>>>> > Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t >>>>> > E-mail: caomanhdat317@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Best regards,* >>>> *Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t* >>>> *E-mail: caomanhdat317@gmail.com * >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > --000000000000db6ac1058c61e815 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
So if there is more time I would like to = backport bug fix=C2=A0LUCENE-8831 which is just fixing the hashcode method = for LatLonShapeBoundingBox query. Is that ok?=C2=A0

On Fri, Jun 28, 20= 19 at 12:39 PM Andrzej Bia=C5=82ecki <a= b@getopt.org> wrote:
I just created SOLR-13583 and I= =E2=80=99ll be working on a fix. This is a serious bug, both in the way it = prevents the old collection deletion and it also may lead to data loss when= used with REINDEXCOLLECTION and removeSource=3Dtrue.

Un= fortunately, my schedule today and over the weekend was already full as it = was, so realistically speaking I can work on this on Monday - unless someon= e else bets me to it.

On 26 Jun = 2019, at 17:38, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:

I had a l= ook before and I could not find the section 8.1.2 in 8x and master. I suppo= sed the entry is created once the version is released, so not sure how to p= roceed.


On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 4:53 PM Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
Thanks Andrezej,
I will do it soon

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 4:43 PM Andrzej= Bia=C5=82ecki <ab@ge= topt.org> wrote:
Ignacio, I think you need to move t= he entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt for this issue to the 8.1.2 section, not jus= t in branch_8_1 but consistenly on master and on branch_8x?

On 25 Jun 2019, at 17:02, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com>= ; wrote:

Hi,

= I would like to backport bug fix LUCENE-8775 that fixes some failures in th= e polygon Tessellator when a polygon contain a hole sharing a vertex with t= he polygon. Is that ok?

Thanks,

Ignacio

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 1:39 AM Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
Hi =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t, I re-enabled the ASF Jenkins = 8.1 jobs. - Steve

On Jun 24, 201= 9, at 8:09 AM, =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh <caomanhdat317@gmail.com> wrot= e:

Hi Uwe, Steve.
Can Jenkins on branch_8_1 be resumed for 8.1.2 release? I am n= ot sure how to enable them on=C2=A0https://builds.apache.org/view/L/view/L= ucene/=C2=A0

Thanks.

On Thu, Jun 13= , 2019 at 10:51 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
Sure Dat, sounds good.

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 2:11 PM =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh <caomanhdat317@gmail= .com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ishan,
>
> If upgrade Jetty seems too much for a bug fix release, I will try to u= pgrade only part that affect SOLR-13413 (one module). Then see how tests wi= ll behave then. Does that sound good?
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:51 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com= > wrote:
>>
>> Have we vetted all other changes to Jetty? Are we sure that they d= on't introduce a different regression?
>>
>> On Thu, 13 Jun, 2019, 4:16 AM Kevin Risden, <krisden@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 to 8.1.2 and the Jetty upgrade. FYI Erick created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13541 specif= ically for the Jetty upgrade.
>>>
>>> Kevin Risden
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 4:47 PM =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t Cao M=E1=BA= =A1nh <caom= anhdat317@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi David, yeah sure, that bug fix seems important.
>>>> I also want to do the upgrade Jetty 9.4.19 for 8.1.2 (fix:= SOLR-13413). Do you guys have any objections?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 3:40 PM David Smiley <david.w.smiley@gmail= .com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes thanks for volunteering.=C2=A0 Also, lets get this= serious bug fix in:=C2=A0 https://issues.apache.org= /jira/browse/SOLR-13523
>>>>>
>>>>> ~ David Smiley
>>>>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley<= /a>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:27 AM =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t Cao M= =E1=BA=A1nh <caomanhdat317@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just right after the 8.1.1 release has been publis= hed we=E2=80=99ve discovered a serious bug in BasicAuthentication which aff= ect all released versions of Solr including 8.0, 8.1, 8.1.1. Details of the= bug can be found in SOLR-13510.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I=E2=80=99m volunteering to do this release, if th= ere are no objections, and I=E2=80=99d like to create a RC early next week.=
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t
>>>>>> E-mail: caomanhdat317@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t
>>>> E-mail: caomanhdat317@gmail.com
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh =C4=90=E1=BA=A1t
> E-mail: c= aomanhdat317@gmail.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org



--
Best regards,
Cao M=E1=BA=A1nh =C4=90= =E1=BA=A1t



--000000000000db6ac1058c61e815--