From dev-return-322623-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Fri May 18 05:33:05 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D198180634 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 05:33:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 51171 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2018 03:33:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 51160 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2018 03:33:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 May 2018 03:33:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1E0BBC0090 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 03:33:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.311 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.311 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmlRlAryZIIZ for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 03:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 257465F3B7 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 03:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 61479E0161 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 03:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1B29721298 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 03:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 03:33:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12338) Replay buffering tlog in parallel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12338?page=3Dcom.atlassian= .jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1648= 0089#comment-16480089 ]=20 Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12338: ------------------------------------- {quote}This is a very costly/risky logic to handle reordered updates {quote} Indeed.=C2=A0 As an aside, my vote for the long term=C2=A0continues to be: = "don't reorder=C2=A0updates between leader and replica" :) > Replay buffering tlog in parallel > --------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-12338 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12338 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)=20 > Reporter: Cao Manh Dat > Assignee: Cao Manh Dat > Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-12338.patch, SOLR-12338.patch, SOLR-12338.patch > > > Since updates with different id are independent, therefore it is safe to = replay them in parallel. This will significantly reduce recovering time of = replicas in high load indexing environment.=20 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org