lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adrien Grand (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7996) Should we require positive scores?
Date Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:31:00 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-7996:
---------------------------------
    Attachment: LUCENE-7996.patch

New patch that maps negative scores to 0. The explanation says when this happens so that this
change is not too trappy.

> Should we require positive scores?
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7996
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7996
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7996.patch, LUCENE-7996.patch
>
>
> Having worked on MAXSCORE recently, things would be simpler if we required that scores
are positive. Practically, this would mean 
>  - forbidding/fixing similarities that may produce negative scores (we have some of them)
>  - forbidding things like negative boosts
>  - fixing the scoring formula of some queries like {{BoostingQuery}} (which subtracts
a score to another score) so that the end result may never be negative
> So I'd be curious to have opinions whether this would be a sane requirement or whether
we need to be able to cope with negative scores eg. because some similarities that we want
to support produce negative scores by design.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message