lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lucene/Solr 7.2
Date Wed, 06 Dec 2017 19:42:06 GMT
Woah, twice the same mistake with different people. Sorry about that!

Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 20:28, Anshum Gupta <anshumg@apple.com> a écrit :

> You meant Ishan here, right ? :)
>
> -Anshum
>
>
>
> On Dec 6, 2017, at 5:02 AM, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the heads up, Anshum.
>
> This leaves us with only SOLR-11458 to wait for before building a RC
> (which might be ready but just not marked as resolved).
>
>
> Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 13:47, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> Hi Adrien,
>> I'm planning to skip SOLR-11624 for this release (as per my last comment
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11624?focusedCommentId=16280121&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16280121).
>> If someone has an objection, please let me know; otherwise, please feel
>> free to proceed with the release.
>> I'll continue working on it anyway, and shall try to have it ready for
>> the next release.
>> Thanks,
>> Ishan
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> FYI I created the new branch for 7.2, so you will have to backport to
>>> this branch. No hurry though, I mostly created the branch so that it's fine
>>> to cherry-pick changes that may wait for 7.3 to be released.
>>>
>>> Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 08:53, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com> a écrit
:
>>>
>>>> Sorry to hear that Ishan, I hope you are doing better now. +1 to get
>>>> SOLR-11624 in.
>>>>
>>>> Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 07:57, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> I was a bit unwell over the weekend and yesterday; I'm working on a
>>>>> very targeted fix for SOLR-11624 right now; I expect it to take another
5-6
>>>>> hours.
>>>>> Is that fine with you, Adrien? If not, please go ahead with the
>>>>> release, and I'll volunteer later for a bugfix release for this after
7.2
>>>>> is out.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Fine with me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 22:34, Varun Thacker <varun@vthacker.in>
a
>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Adrien,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to commit SOLR-11590 . The issue had a patch couple
of
>>>>>>> weeks ago and has been reviewed but never got committed. I've
run all the
>>>>>>> tests twice as well to verify.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Andrzej Białecki <
>>>>>>> andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 18:05, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andrzej, ok to merge since it is a bug fix. Since we're close
to
>>>>>>>> the RC build, maybe try to get someone familiar with the
code to review it
>>>>>>>> to make sure it doesn't have unexpected side-effects?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure I’ll do this - thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 17:57, Andrzej Białecki <
>>>>>>>> andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Adrien,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If it’s ok I would also like to merge SOLR-11458, this
>>>>>>>>> significantly reduces the chance of accidental data loss
when using
>>>>>>>>> MoveReplicaCmd.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 14:44, Adrien Grand <jpountz@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Quick update:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LUCENE-8043, SOLR-9137, SOLR-11662 and SOLR-11687 have
been
>>>>>>>>> merged, they will be in 7.2.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LUCENE-8048 and SOLR-11624 are still open.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LUCENE-8048 looks like it could make things better in
some cases
>>>>>>>>> but I don't think it is required for 7.2, so I don't
plan to hold the
>>>>>>>>> release on it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> SOLR-11624 looks bad, I'll wait for it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 07:45, Noble Paul <noble.paul@gmail.com>
a
>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 this is over due
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 4, 2017 16:38, "Varun Thacker" <varun@vthacker.in>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 Adrien ! Thanks for taking it up
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Christine Poerschke
(BLOOMBERG/
>>>>>>>>>> QUEEN VIC) <cpoerschke@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137
>>>>>>>>>>> included in the release. Hoping to commit it
on/by Tuesday.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Christine
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 12/01/17 10:11:59
>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Lucene/Solr 7.2
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's been more than 6 weeks since we released
7.1 and we
>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated a good set of changes, so I think
we should release Lucene/Solr
>>>>>>>>>>> 7.2.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There is one change that I would like to have
before building a
>>>>>>>>>>> RC: LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost
ready to be merged.
>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if there are any other changes
that should make it to
>>>>>>>>>>> the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently
thinking of
>>>>>>>>>>> building the first release candidate next wednesday,
December 6th.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message