lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 7.0 Release Update
Date Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:14:05 GMT
sorry for the last minute notice. I need to fix the folowing as well.
It may take a few hours
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11239

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Andrzej Białecki
<andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> wrote:
> Then, if I may be so bold, I’d like to slip in SOLR-11235, which is a simple
> AlreadyClosedException prevention fix. Patch is ready, tests are passing.
>
> On 14 Aug 2017, at 19:17, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>
> Thanks Ab.
>
> I'll cut an RC on Wednesday, so that both, I get the time, and also that the
> tests get some time on Jenkins.
>
> Anshum
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:29 AM Andrzej Białecki
> <andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve committed the fix for SOLR-11221 to branch_7_0 (and branch_7x and
>> master).
>>
>> On 12 Aug 2017, at 02:20, Andrzej Białecki
>> <andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Anshum,
>>
>> The patch for SOLR-11221 is ready, with one caveat - it required larger
>> changes than I thought, so there’s a sizeable chunk of new code that is not
>> so well tested… I added a test that used to fail without this change, and
>> manual testing confirms that metrics are now correctly reported after core
>> reloads.
>>
>> We could postpone this fix to 7.0.1 if there are objections, but I think
>> it should go in to 7.0 - without the fix JMX reporting is surely broken,
>> with the fix it’s only a possibility ;)
>>
>>
>> On 11 Aug 2017, at 19:59, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the report Mark!
>>
>> and yes, I'll wait until the JMX issue is fixed.
>>
>> Anshum
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:49 AM Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah, let's not release a major version with JMX monitoring broken.
>>>
>>> Here is a 30 run test report for the 7.0 branch:
>>> http://apache-solr-7-0.bitballoon.com/20170811
>>>
>>> - Mark
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:02 PM Tomas Fernandez Lobbe <tflobbe@apple.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Lets fix it before releasing. I’d hate to release with a known critical
>>>> bug.
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 10, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Ab,
>>>>
>>>> How quickly are we talking about? If you suggest, we could wait,
>>>> depending upon the impact, and the time required to fix it.
>>>>
>>>> Anshum
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM Andrzej Białecki
>>>> <andrzej.bialecki@lucidworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I just discovered SOLR-11221, which basically breaks JMX monitoring.
We
>>>>> could either release with “known issues” and then quickly do 7.0.1,
or wait
>>>>> until it’s fixed.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10 Aug 2017, at 18:55, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll generate a test report for the 7.0 branch tonight so we can
>>>>> evaluate that for an rc as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Mark
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good news!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't see any 'blockers' for 7.0 anymore, which means, after giving
>>>>>> Jenkins a couple of days, I'll cut out an RC. I intend to do this
on
>>>>>> Wednesday/Thursday, unless a blocker comes up, which I hope shouldn't
be the
>>>>>> case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anshum
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I worked through the list of issues with the
>>>>>>> "numeric-tries-to-points” label and marked those as 7.0 Blocker
that seemed
>>>>>>> reasonable, on the assumption that we should at a minimum give
clear error
>>>>>>> messages for points non-compatibility.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made,
I’m
>>>>>>> willing to discuss on the issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now.
 I
>>>>>>> would welcome assistance in clearing them up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers,
of which
>>>>>>> there are currently 12:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone
else has a
>>>>>>> > spare cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please
do.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > -Anshum
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett
>>>>>>> > <casstargett@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> > I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark
all
>>>>>>> > Trie*
>>>>>>> > fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working
on. As
>>>>>>> > he
>>>>>>> > noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2
weeks. Is
>>>>>>> > anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled
for 2+
>>>>>>> > more
>>>>>>> > weeks?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs
with
>>>>>>> > PointFields and make a case if any should be considered
blockers
>>>>>>> > for
>>>>>>> > 7.0. I think they all share a label:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter
>>>>>>> > <hossman_lucene@fucit.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that
we want to
>>>>>>> > > deprecate
>>>>>>> > > : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the
7.0 release
>>>>>>> > > until
>>>>>>> > > : that's done, it's more than just updating the example
schemas
>>>>>>> > > if we
>>>>>>> > > : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still
need to fix
>>>>>>> > > the tests
>>>>>>> > > : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful
for
>>>>>>> > > users. And
>>>>>>> > > : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some
more
>>>>>>> > > volunteers.
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips
on how
>>>>>>> > > people can
>>>>>>> > > help out...
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > -Hoss
>>>>>>> > > http://www.lucidworks.com/
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> - Mark
>>>>> about.me/markrmiller
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> - Mark
>>> about.me/markrmiller
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message