Return-Path: <dev-return-270866-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org>
X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io
Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183])
	by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17290200C07
	for <archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io>; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:31:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix)
	id 15C93160B45; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:31:32 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 60F7B160B38
	for <archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io>; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:31:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 28536 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2017 09:31:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28436 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2017 09:31:30 -0000
Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:31:30 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C164EC0859
	for <dev@lucene.apache.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:31:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8])
	by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id L6xRsDWeQGDb for <dev@lucene.apache.org>;
	Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:31:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139])
	by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 210675F23A
	for <dev@lucene.apache.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:31:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139])
	by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BF7C0E00EB
	for <dev@lucene.apache.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:31:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 758E324E02
	for <dev@lucene.apache.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:31:26 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:31:26 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.13036864.1485076280000.72732.1485077486478@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.13036864.1485076280000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.13036864.1485076280000@Atlassian.JIRA> <JIRA.13036864.1485076280893@jira-lw-us.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7651) Javadocs build fails with Java 8
 update 121
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394
archived-at: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:31:32 -0000


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15833412#comment-15833412 ] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-7651:
---------------------------------------

I checked it out, it disallows any {{<script>}}, also externally linked ones in the {{-bottom}} parameter of Javadocs. This is amajor pain. As adding this special allow-javascript parameter is brekaing builds with older versions and its hard to detect the exact build version in Ant, we have 2 options:

- Remove prettify.js
- Inject the prettify code somehow else into the docs (e.g. by copying all script files together and append them to the javadoc-generated JS file after javadoc succeeds).

> Javadocs build fails with Java 8 update 121
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7651
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: general/javadocs
>    Affects Versions: 6.4
>         Environment: Java 8 update 121
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: Java8
>
> Oracle released the recent Java 8 security update (u121). The Jenkins builds fail with the following error while building the Javadocs:
> {noformat}
>   [javadoc] Constructing Javadoc information...
>   [javadoc] javadoc: error - Argument for -bottom contains JavaScript.
>   [javadoc] Use --allow-script-in-comments to allow use of JavaScript.
>   [javadoc] 1 error
> {noformat}
> This is caused by the Javascript added to pretty-print code examples. We load this in the page footer "{{<bottom>}}" parameter.
> Surely, it will be posisble to simply add the mentioned argument, but this will break builds with earlier Java 8 versions.
> This is nowhere documented, I haven't seen any documentation about this flag nowhere, so I assume this is a bug in Java. They can't change or add command line parameters in minor updates of Java 8. I will ask on the OpenJDK mailing lists if this is a bug (maybe accidentally backported from Java 9).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org