Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1F5200B8A for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:16:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 98C9A160ACA; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 04:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E14F0160AC2 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 06:16:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 86692 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2016 04:16:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 86669 invoked by uid 99); 10 Sep 2016 04:16:13 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 04:16:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 47F081A03BD for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 04:16:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z9P23GG5DLW7 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 04:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (mail-oi0-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D62325F2F0 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 04:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id c192so23736132oih.2 for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 21:16:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nAx2vTVgvudoPWRVNzomNUPoo6H7R539v+I0rRWlMOs=; b=vfRedslRqKmfURu7TaJUFDAnNS4lHk8IGm24cyT7Hgp4+ZfWxVIh0s+CPuxoFnntqb QwrZaERxJSHIsNJ0zeu7qFGxl+h4ZtUwsIyDy9RXRJjitjCBegFvxZeet8PrQjRv9P9/ YWJqSqLaMqdGhURPGKbyKHpUI9mY7FOfBuRHUL5gsar/tK1rVh8h6mQ70ZG/UCDoifLq Iy4/jSVsMzfFrenxsI6fqGL3Whxj4q7WpNaeg2Ir3aT9PyspOqPq5ZwZ2tybF0rR4dhF 2mweJMq9Kmi/pVloztL4JQfNbleh7SivO4XUM/tnGhTe+NDFS7nOyHGHWZ+rY5P/C4HQ UH5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nAx2vTVgvudoPWRVNzomNUPoo6H7R539v+I0rRWlMOs=; b=ZH1oGi/txvLfuYh2DXG9OEaq9qXxDqd+PStJdHqrtHMgEzPt0cLsgPuxkk0qg486sz Ck5cNON/jK2149AkRAbmUTMBFFPX/PYZ7GFnaymHjzMUZ/1vtcFakoNRBrjDxZZzLbAY HH/oIJAXIBxmb2Dvqi75D1pJoTkWxssFce8+WWzlytf9J/bRXg3E1yF6EEK9VtOVdhbb GHUSGXhUtrZu3JM06k9L9+t/16gGvga0HnBKWSV5jRyFaUPYGxuY1a/yve2sCEoke6Ln GuS7Ng7uzOwC9xe7TVFLQtIqz1jcH63J70k5UrOfD6W9PRsydz98xxlpMCc291i9Eoe5 6iSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOAKGc6Fcm6vBaCTdN7RUV9ya0Tvn9QeW/VjRT0XcWW0oDYOfVwJsb1gDCOEvX+oWrHu4RtquVLSxrTsQ== X-Received: by 10.202.170.14 with SMTP id t14mr10409671oie.160.1473480970205; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 21:16:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.114.234 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 21:15:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Alexandre Rafalovitch Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 11:15:29 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Is "solr.AnalyzerName" expansion supposed to work for Analyzers? To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 04:16:19 -0000 I can't see a reason why it should be different, but: This works This does not: This does work again: Both LowerCaseTokenizerFactory and SimpleAnalyzer are in the same package. Is this a bug or some sort of legacy decision? Regards, Alex. ---- Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates: http://www.solr-start.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org