Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42AC200B6B for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 17:17:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A2B3A160AC2; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 15:17:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C5914160AA3 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 17:17:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 26868 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2016 15:17:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 26857 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2016 15:17:12 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 15:17:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 01D08C2E54 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 15:17:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yNHgp8FAPva8 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 15:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com (mail-it0-f42.google.com [209.85.214.42]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E62045FB14 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 15:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id c198so19129482ith.0 for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:17:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8lNPm7M32oR1IOAL3KfbEO+DFdpxOPrx/kcvM+FGIZ0=; b=K+VrpK6VopCGskS/pq9uzOna9NqTuK9Tb6BcxAY7Mz6YQkEA8gQubEFH2uGW5mZB8r p8vc+GvHhiZwY/2Hst5WNP4gjnaTChhosJK1iv+jF0V6A9F1NE5/2FgkkjqUzmb6zIZ+ 02fD/fI20TrTdQGl7KhEFCmHtUTJUHnNxfs92VxIH0LlavjxgdaQn6+ePTH4mYTFB5Pu uIYkawvpJdRwgCM1fFdtScOGeu50hzKqqVRgkAsk60OUvDfy1qyS1Zd0cAa/Hx77mhIg CT6xXPCJTSrVupmPehOA3HrL5evFcCRiWqfZU/V1IyJ1kx8xpiy9konGfnxyDRsz8dYs j9Lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=8lNPm7M32oR1IOAL3KfbEO+DFdpxOPrx/kcvM+FGIZ0=; b=Dmq2XF7nYwCvKqfmlToSG8hNL1OIoMNBLsvBn4hN8n9X1B8nsL7niTIFKXFE5pMkD7 uHM1OJft9m8oXtO32cgfiyKYf042FMZKw7HhtiKZP4gxbRrSp+gaQMvbD5eEM3/3sXNh PMnBOx114PzbR1YxAnkjQOZYlU3rYwtZkq7H1KKNcLPYQQ2O31Rkg8c25dF9L++kmdGU YI5W1of0143BYQxzPUJePRfe/v2F5sMhstAyKqwz0YPB5j9kEiP07QryGiKN5cxbWukv briVrj9IePZNc1VPq5L1jqX/Vvb8awig/AU3BInnyZjE6OYP0DfAX0kp//hJEOiKnkOE h0FA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPhUOBgYMrDbdp/7tkiIuRt2Ka71B3J4pejR4HUk2Y29vQZw76FU9lWd/F2feEnKj+Awh2UAuxfMphoHQ== X-Received: by 10.157.51.43 with SMTP id f40mr6137235otc.130.1473434221995; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:17:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Smiley Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 15:16:50 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release Solr 5.5.3 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ce9da66f6b6053c14a32b archived-at: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 15:17:14 -0000 --001a113ce9da66f6b6053c14a32b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Anhum, Minutes ago I went and committed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7417 to master, branch_6x, branch_5x, and branch_5_5. While on both the v5 branches, I noticed the last 5.5.x was specifically 5.5.2 so I went and added this under a new 5.5.3. That is now committed. Then the realization hits me that you're doing a 5.5.3 release and it just passed a vote So I guess I should change those entries to be 5.5.4 and probably also add a blank 5.5.3 section so it's clear there were not additions in 5.5.3 for Lucene? BTW I think this bug is "minor" IMO. ~ David On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:29 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > The release notes (draft) can be found here: > > Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote553 > Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote553 > > Please feel free to edit/fix it. > > -Anshum > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM David Smiley > wrote: > >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for those >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm >> bells too loudly :-) >> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates. >>> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else, >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now. >>> >>> -- >>> Anshum Gupta >>> >> -- >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >> > -- Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com --001a113ce9da66f6b6053c14a32b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Anhum,
Minutes ago I went and committed=C2=A0https://issues.apach= e.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7417=C2=A0to master, branch_6x, branch_5x, and= branch_5_5.=C2=A0 While on both the v5 branches, I noticed the last 5.5.x = was specifically 5.5.2 so I went and added this under a new 5.5.3. =C2=A0 T= hat is now committed.=C2=A0 Then the realization hits me that you're do= ing a 5.5.3 release and it just passed a vote =C2=A0So I guess I should cha= nge those entries to be 5.5.4 and probably also add a blank 5.5.3 section s= o it's clear there were not additions in 5.5.3 for Lucene?=C2=A0 BTW I = think this bug is "minor" IMO.
~ David

<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:29 PM A= nshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupt= a.net> wrote:
The release notes (draft) can be found here:

Lucene:= =C2=A0https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote553
<= br>
Please feel free to edit/fix it.

-Anshum
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 P= M David Smiley <david.w.smiley@gmail.com> wrote:
Okay.=C2=A0 BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just&= quot; high indexing rates, but it's for those using SSL too -- correct = me if I'm wrong.=C2=A0 We don't want to raise alarm bells too loudl= y :-)

On Wed, Jul 20, = 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
Hi,

With=C2=A0SOLR= -9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it impacts all users= with high indexing rates.=C2=A0

If someone else w= ants to work on the release, I am fine with it else, I'll be happy to b= e the RM and cut an RC a week from now.

--
Anshum Gupta
--
Lucene/Solr Search Committe= r, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
--
<= /div>
Lucene/S= olr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
--001a113ce9da66f6b6053c14a32b--