lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
Subject Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Date Thu, 01 Sep 2016 18:48:21 GMT
I've been trying to the RC out since yesterday but our tests are holding me
back. Once they pass, I'll have the RC out (should be in a few hours).


On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net> wrote:

> Thanks Uwe.
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Anshum,
>>
>>
>>
>> I will now enable the tests for 5.5 branch on Jenkins!
>>
>>
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>>
>> Uwe Schindler
>>
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>
>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:anshum@anshumgupta.net]
>> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM
>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
>>
>>
>>
>> With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to
>> resume the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an
>> RC out on Wednesday.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Anshum
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for
>> SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any
>> clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are
>> objections.
>>
>>
>>
>> @Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if
>> it makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <pushkar.raste@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
>>
>> On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <erickerickson@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
>> to that branch as well.
>>
>> Erick
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading
>> to
>> > unstable state in Solr.
>> >
>> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests.
>> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <david.w.smiley@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Okay.  BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
>> those
>> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong.  We don't want to raise alarm
>> >> bells too loudly :-)
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>> >>>
>> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Anshum Gupta
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Anshum Gupta
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message