lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
Subject Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Date Fri, 09 Sep 2016 17:39:45 GMT
Hey David,

I'm just about to update the website and send out the notification for
5.5.3 in a few hours (as soon as I get some time at work). About the
section, I assume you are talking about the CHANGES.txt file and I
should've done that as part of the release process but I think I missed the
5x, and master branches. I've added the 5.5.3 section to both, and moved
your entry to a new 5.5.4 section on the 5x branch.
5.5.4 section addition on branch_5_5 is a part of the post-release process,
so I'll remember to move this to the correct section when I add that.



On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:17 AM David Smiley <david.w.smiley@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Anhum,
> Minutes ago I went and committed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7417 to master, branch_6x,
> branch_5x, and branch_5_5.  While on both the v5 branches, I noticed the
> last 5.5.x was specifically 5.5.2 so I went and added this under a new
> 5.5.3.   That is now committed.  Then the realization hits me that you're
> doing a 5.5.3 release and it just passed a vote  So I guess I should change
> those entries to be 5.5.4 and probably also add a blank 5.5.3 section so
> it's clear there were not additions in 5.5.3 for Lucene?  BTW I think this
> bug is "minor" IMO.
> ~ David
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:29 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> The release notes (draft) can be found here:
>>
>> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote553
>> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote553
>>
>> Please feel free to edit/fix it.
>>
>> -Anshum
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM David Smiley <david.w.smiley@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Okay.  BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
>>> those using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong.  We don't want to raise
>>> alarm bells too loudly :-)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>>>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>>>
>>>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>>>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>>
>> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>

Mime
View raw message